State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Uttam Harikrushna Mandal — 427/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),65(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG170006462023
e-Filing Number
06-11-2023
Filing Number
578/2023
Filing Date
06-11-2023
Registration No
427/2023
Registration Date
07-11-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
429
Police Station
Bhiwapur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur
Adv. V. W. Wankhade
Respondent(s)
Uttam Harikrushna Mandal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 16-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Uttam Harikrishna Mandal, under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while chemical analysis confirmed the seized bottles contained illicit liquor, the prosecution could not establish the panchnama (seizure record) through independent witnesses, creating doubt about the recovery. The judgment emphasized insufficient evidence and inadequate witness testimony to establish the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Uttam Harikrishna Mandal, under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while chemical analysis confirmed the seized bottles contained illicit liquor, the prosecution could not establish the panchnama (seizure record) through independent witnesses, creating doubt about the recovery. The judgment emphasized insufficient evidence and inadequate witness testimony to establish the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts