State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur vs Uttam Harikrushna Mandal — 427/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),65(a). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG170006462023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-11-2023

Filing Number

578/2023

Filing Date

06-11-2023

Registration No

427/2023

Registration Date

07-11-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

429

Police Station

Bhiwapur

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e),65(a)

Petitioner(s)

State of Mah. through Police Station, Bhiwapur

Adv. V. W. Wankhade

Respondent(s)

Uttam Harikrushna Mandal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR

02-05-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Arguments

06-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

16-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

10-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Uttam Harikrishna Mandal, under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while chemical analysis confirmed the seized bottles contained illicit liquor, the prosecution could not establish the panchnama (seizure record) through independent witnesses, creating doubt about the recovery. The judgment emphasized insufficient evidence and inadequate witness testimony to establish the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Evidence
16-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Uttam Harikrishna Mandal, under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E)(A), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while chemical analysis confirmed the seized bottles contained illicit liquor, the prosecution could not establish the panchnama (seizure record) through independent witnesses, creating doubt about the recovery. The judgment emphasized insufficient evidence and inadequate witness testimony to establish the guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case