Waman Ramdas Gedam vs State of Maharashtra Through Excise Department — 13/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG170001912026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
167/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhiwapur
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Waman Ramdas Gedam
Adv. Sanket P. Aherrao
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Excise Department
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. AND J.M.F.C.,BHIWAPUR
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized vehicle to applicant Waman Ramdas Gedam, as the registered owner. The court found that keeping the vehicle in police custody would cause deterioration in its value, and ordered its release on a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond with strict conditions: the vehicle cannot be sold, altered, or used in any crime, and must be produced as directed during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized vehicle to applicant Waman Ramdas Gedam, as the registered owner. The court found that keeping the vehicle in police custody would cause deterioration in its value, and ordered its release on a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond with strict conditions: the vehicle cannot be sold, altered, or used in any crime, and must be produced as directed during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts