HAVELIWALA CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD vs PARVESH PAWAN JINDAL Advocate - Piyush Mukesh Shukla — 106/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Reply/Say Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG150024882025

e-Filing Number

15-10-2025

Filing Number

259/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

106/2025

Registration Date

16-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

3-Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAVELIWALA CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD

    Adv. ZEESHAN ZAKA HAQ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARVESH PAWAN JINDAL Advocate - Piyush Mukesh Shukla

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Compliance

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt Cjjd And JMFC, Hingna

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The plaintiff's application for status quo relief to maintain the existing state of affairs regarding an allegedly encroached sanctioned road was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the immediacy, urgency, and extreme circumstances required for granting extraordinary relief of status quo, and directed the plaintiff to pursue a more detailed specific application for temporary injunction with proper notice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The plaintiff's application for status quo relief to maintain the existing state of affairs regarding an allegedly encroached sanctioned road was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the immediacy, urgency, and extreme circumstances required for granting extraordinary relief of status quo, and directed the plaintiff to pursue a more detailed specific application for temporary injunction with proper notice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case