HAVELIWALA CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD vs PARVESH PAWAN JINDAL Advocate - Piyush Mukesh Shukla — 106/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG150024882025
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
15-10-2025
Filing Number
259/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
16-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAVELIWALA CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
Adv. ZEESHAN ZAKA HAQ
Respondent(s)
PARVESH PAWAN JINDAL Advocate - Piyush Mukesh Shukla
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JT CJJD AND JMFC, HINGNA
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 17-04-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 27-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 10-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 06-02-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The plaintiff's application for status quo relief to maintain the existing state of affairs regarding an allegedly encroached sanctioned road was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the immediacy, urgency, and extreme circumstances required for granting extraordinary relief of status quo, and directed the plaintiff to pursue a more detailed specific application for temporary injunction with proper notice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The plaintiff's application for status quo relief to maintain the existing state of affairs regarding an allegedly encroached sanctioned road was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the immediacy, urgency, and extreme circumstances required for granting extraordinary relief of status quo, and directed the plaintiff to pursue a more detailed specific application for temporary injunction with proper notice to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts