State of Maharashtra Through Government Labour Officer and Inspector vs Santosh Kedar — 295/2026

Case under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Section 13-A(1), 25,Rules 8, 20(2), 18(3). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG150004332026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

375/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

295/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Section 13-A(1), 25,Rules 8, 20(2), 18(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through Government Labour Officer and Inspector

    Adv. Utkarsh Dattatray Morankar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Kedar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 295/2026 Santosh Kedar, proprietor of M/s. Vaidyanath Fire Services Pvt. Ltd., was convicted on 09-05-2026 for violating the Maharashtra Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The accused pleaded guilty to failing to maintain a Register of Advances in Form IV and failing to display mandatory notices regarding payment dates, wage rates, and statutory abstracts at the establishment in Nagpur. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,500 fine on each of two counts (total Rs. 3,000), with default imprisonment of two days per count. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 295/2026 Santosh Kedar, proprietor of M/s. Vaidyanath Fire Services Pvt. Ltd., was convicted on 09-05-2026 for violating the Maharashtra Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The accused pleaded guilty to failing to maintain a Register of Advances in Form IV and failing to display mandatory notices regarding payment dates, wage rates, and statutory abstracts at the establishment in Nagpur. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,500 fine on each of two counts (total Rs. 3,000), with default imprisonment of two days per count. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case