State of Maharashtra Through Government Labour Officer and Inspector vs Santosh Kedar — 295/2026
Case under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Section 13-A(1), 25,Rules 8, 20(2), 18(3). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150004332026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
375/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
295/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Government Labour Officer and Inspector
Adv. Utkarsh Dattatray Morankar
Respondent(s)
Santosh Kedar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 295/2026 Santosh Kedar, proprietor of M/s. Vaidyanath Fire Services Pvt. Ltd., was convicted on 09-05-2026 for violating the Maharashtra Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The accused pleaded guilty to failing to maintain a Register of Advances in Form IV and failing to display mandatory notices regarding payment dates, wage rates, and statutory abstracts at the establishment in Nagpur. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,500 fine on each of two counts (total Rs. 3,000), with default imprisonment of two days per count. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 295/2026 Santosh Kedar, proprietor of M/s. Vaidyanath Fire Services Pvt. Ltd., was convicted on 09-05-2026 for violating the Maharashtra Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The accused pleaded guilty to failing to maintain a Register of Advances in Form IV and failing to display mandatory notices regarding payment dates, wage rates, and statutory abstracts at the establishment in Nagpur. The Judicial Magistrate sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,500 fine on each of two counts (total Rs. 3,000), with default imprisonment of two days per count. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts