State of Maharashtra Through Government Labour officer and Insector vs Santosh Kedar — 294/2026
Case under Minimum Wages Act Section 19(4),Rules 30, 28. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG150004312026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
374/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
294/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Hingna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Government Labour officer and Insector
Adv. Utkarsh Dattatray Morankar
Respondent(s)
Santosh Kedar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C.Hingna
Disposed
Lok-Nyayalaya
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 294/2026 Santosh Kedar, proprietor of M/s. Vaidyanath Fire Services Pvt. Ltd., was charged with violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for failing to maintain and produce a bound inspection book and muster roll-cum wage register during an inspection on 19-12-2025. The accused pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court convicted him under Section 22(A) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with two days rigorous imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 294/2026 Santosh Kedar, proprietor of M/s. Vaidyanath Fire Services Pvt. Ltd., was charged with violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for failing to maintain and produce a bound inspection book and muster roll-cum wage register during an inspection on 19-12-2025. The accused pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hingna. The court convicted him under Section 22(A) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with two days rigorous imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts