Sunita Madan Hatwar vs Pralhad Daulat Hatwar Advocate - .. — 237/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--DECREED AFTER FULL TRIAL on 17th March 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG130031292023
Filing Number
964/2023
Filing Date
21-08-2023
Registration No
237/2023
Registration Date
29-09-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED AFTER FULL TRIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita Madan Hatwar
Adv. A. M. Deole
Respondent(s)
Pralhad Daulat Hatwar Advocate - ..
Madan Daulat Hatwar
Adv. J.D. Gaikwad
Gendlal Daulat Hatwar
Adv. J.D. Gaikwad
Nandlal Daulat Hatwar
Adv. Sau. J.D. Gaikwad
Surekha Tukaram Rahate
Adv. Sau. J.D. Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
Disposed
Judgment
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Additional Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Additional Issues |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek decreed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 10/05/2021, directing defendants to execute a registered sale deed in favor of plaintiff Sunita for agricultural land valued at Rs. 20 lakhs. The court found that the plaintiff had paid Rs. 9 lakhs earnest money, was ready and willing to pay the balance Rs. 11 lakhs, and that defendant No. 1 unlawfully refused to execute the deed despite other co-owners' willingness, thereby breaching the contract. Defendants must complete the sale deed within two months upon receipt of the remaining consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge Senior Division, Ramtek decreed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 10/05/2021, directing defendants to execute a registered sale deed in favor of plaintiff Sunita for agricultural land valued at Rs. 20 lakhs. The court found that the plaintiff had paid Rs. 9 lakhs earnest money, was ready and willing to pay the balance Rs. 11 lakhs, and that defendant No. 1 unlawfully refused to execute the deed despite other co-owners' willingness, thereby breaching the contract. Defendants must complete the sale deed within two months upon receipt of the remaining consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts