Lata Janaklal Gajbhiye vs Ravishankar Harinath Pal Advocate - S. M. Kushwaha — 118/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG130028712025
e-Filing Number
04-12-2025
Filing Number
566/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
118/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ramtek
Judge
17-Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lata Janaklal Gajbhiye
Adv. FALEKAR MAHESH CHANDRABHAN
-
2.Usha Pradeep Bhoyar
Adv. FALEKAR MAHESH CHANDRABHAN
-
3.Bhaiya Bhadduji Pounikar
Adv. FALEKAR MAHESH CHANDRABHAN
-
4.Nagabai Bhadduji Pounikar
Adv. FALEKAR MAHESH CHANDRABHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravishankar Harinath Pal Advocate - S. M. Kushwaha
-
2.Shraddha Ravishankar Pal
Adv. S. M. Kushwaha
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary The Court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from disposing of agricultural land. The court found no prima facie case of fraud, as the registered sale deed carried presumption of validity and plaintiffs failed to produce substantive evidence of misrepresentation or fraudulent execution. The court vacated the status-quo order and dismissed the interim relief application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Issues
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
16-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Order
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
02-Apr-2026
Report
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
24-Mar-2026
Report
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
12-Mar-2026
Report
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
05-Mar-2026
Report
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
12-Feb-2026
Report
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
05-Feb-2026
Report
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
16-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
15-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
06-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Sr. Dn., Ramtek
-
04-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2025
Summary The Court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from disposing of agricultural land. The court found no prima facie case of fraud, as the registered sale deed carried presumption of validity and plaintiffs failed to produce substantive evidence of misrepresentation or fraudulent execution. The court vacated the status-quo order and dismissed the interim relief application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts