State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed vs Gajanan Mahadev Pokle — 348/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 27th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120005072026
Filing Number
449/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
348/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Mahadev Pokle
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 02-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Gajanan Mahadev Pokle (348/2026) The court convicted 66-year-old Gajanan Mahadev Pokle under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for drinking liquor in a public place without permit on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the magistrate accepted his plea, considering him guilty of the offense. Given his clean record, poverty, and the minor nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Gajanan Mahadev Pokle (348/2026) The court convicted 66-year-old Gajanan Mahadev Pokle under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for drinking liquor in a public place without permit on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the magistrate accepted his plea, considering him guilty of the offense. Given his clean record, poverty, and the minor nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts