State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed vs Gajanan Mahadev Pokle — 348/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120005072026

Filing Number

449/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

348/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Gajanan Mahadev Pokle

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
27-Apr-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: State v. Gajanan Mahadev Pokle (348/2026) The court convicted 66-year-old Gajanan Mahadev Pokle under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for drinking liquor in a public place without permit on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the magistrate accepted his plea, considering him guilty of the offense. Given his clean record, poverty, and the minor nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
27-Apr-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
22-Apr-2026

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
14-Mar-2026

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
02-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Gajanan Mahadev Pokle (348/2026) The court convicted 66-year-old Gajanan Mahadev Pokle under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for drinking liquor in a public place without permit on 05/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the magistrate accepted his plea, considering him guilty of the offense. Given his clean record, poverty, and the minor nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.