Ramkrushaha Bahaiyaji Warkhade vs The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Mumbai 32 Advocate - W. M. Quazi — 183/2018
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHNG100022042018
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
7695/2018
Filing Date
11-12-2018
Registration No
183/2018
Registration Date
14-12-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramkrushaha Bahaiyaji Warkhade
Adv. S. G. Charde
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Mumbai 32 Advocate - W. M. Quazi
Chairman, V.I.D.C., Nagpur
The Executive Engineer, Nagpur
District Collector, Nagpur
Adv. W. M. Quazi
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Nagpur
Adv. W. M. Quazi
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 30-10-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This document records witness testimony in L.A.R. No. 183/2018 (Ramkrushna v. State & Ors.), a land acquisition dispute heard before the C.J.S.D., Umred on 20.02.2025. Witness Durga Sanjay Warkhade, acting as power of attorney holder for the bed-ridden claimant (his father-in-law), testified regarding property valuation and submitted numerous exhibits including sale deeds, awards, and land records. During cross-examination, critical gaps emerged: no medical report substantiated the claimant's bedridden status, no income documentation was provided for crops from the acquired land, and no comparative analysis was submitted—weakening the claimant's valuation arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records witness testimony in L.A.R. No. 183/2018 (Ramkrushna v. State & Ors.), a land acquisition dispute heard before the C.J.S.D., Umred on 20.02.2025. Witness Durga Sanjay Warkhade, acting as power of attorney holder for the bed-ridden claimant (his father-in-law), testified regarding property valuation and submitted numerous exhibits including sale deeds, awards, and land records. During cross-examination, critical gaps emerged: no medical report substantiated the claimant's bedridden status, no income documentation was provided for crops from the acquired land, and no comparative analysis was submitted—weakening the claimant's valuation arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts