Baburao Rakhdu Kullarkar vs State of Maharashtra through Secretory Mumbai Advocate - W. M. Quazi — 200207/2008
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHNG100011142008
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
200197/2008
Filing Date
17-03-2008
Registration No
200207/2008
Registration Date
17-03-2008
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baburao Rakhdu Kullarkar
Adv. D.M.Fule1.
Gajanan S/o Bapurao Kullarkar
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through Secretory Mumbai Advocate - W. M. Quazi
Chief Engineer Nagpur
Adv. A.G.Wandile
Executive Engineer Nagpur
Adv. A.G.Wandile
State Of Mah. through collector, Nagpur
Adv. W. M. Quazi
Spl.Land Acq. Officer No.1
Adv. W. M. Quazi
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness examination record from L.A.R. No. 207/2008 (Baburao v. State & ors.), a land acquisition case. The first witness, Gajanan Baburao Kullarkar, testified regarding houses acquired by the government approximately 40 years prior, stating the family received only a plot in lieu of acquisition with no construction amount, and denied filing a false case for additional compensation. The cross-examination by respondents' counsel challenged the petitioner's claims but the witness maintained his position that no false case was filed and the valuation was made as per the situation at the time of acquisition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness examination record from L.A.R. No. 207/2008 (Baburao v. State & ors.), a land acquisition case. The first witness, Gajanan Baburao Kullarkar, testified regarding houses acquired by the government approximately 40 years prior, stating the family received only a plot in lieu of acquisition with no construction amount, and denied filing a false case for additional compensation. The cross-examination by respondents' counsel challenged the petitioner's claims but the witness maintained his position that no false case was filed and the valuation was made as per the situation at the time of acquisition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts