Bhagatsingh Nagari Sahakari Pat Purvtha Lmt. Umred, vs Arun Baburaoji Giradkar Advocate - S. M. Pimpalkar — 100/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHNG100010722017
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
1604/2017
Filing Date
01-01-2014
Registration No
100/2017
Registration Date
07-01-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagatsingh Nagari Sahakari Pat Purvtha Lmt. Umred,
Adv. N. R. Bhisekar
President, Bhagatsingh Nagari Pat Purwatha, Sanstha, Umred Through Anirudha Manoharrao Sangit
Adv. N. R. Bhishikar
The Vice President of Bhagatsingh Nagari Patsanstha, Umred Through Anurag Baburao Bokde
Adv. A. C. Bhishikar
Respondent(s)
Arun Baburaoji Giradkar Advocate - S. M. Pimpalkar
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Civil Judge Senior Division, Umrer
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 100/2017, the court allowed the plaintiffs' application for permission to lead additional evidence. The plaintiffs sought to introduce a letter dated 22-05-2019 wherein the late defendant requested the Nagar Parishad to remove the plaintiff society's charge on his property, claiming loan repayment. The court found this evidence relevant to contest the defendant's assertions and granted permission despite the advanced stage of trial, noting the evidence was discovered through RTI after the plaintiffs' case closed. The defendant retained the right to cross-examine and adduce further evidence in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Special Civil Suit No. 100/2017, the court allowed the plaintiffs' application for permission to lead additional evidence. The plaintiffs sought to introduce a letter dated 22-05-2019 wherein the late defendant requested the Nagar Parishad to remove the plaintiff society's charge on his property, claiming loan repayment. The court found this evidence relevant to contest the defendant's assertions and granted permission despite the advanced stage of trial, noting the evidence was discovered through RTI after the plaintiffs' case closed. The defendant retained the right to cross-examine and adduce further evidence in response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts