Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi vs State of Maharashtra Through PS Bela — 29/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG100004012026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
315/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
528
Police Station
Bela
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi
Adv. Sakshi Sanjay Dhote
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PS (Police Station) Bela
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed applicant Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi's application for interim custody of Rs. 70,000 seized in Crime No. 528/2025. The court found that the applicant prima-facie established ownership of the cash amount, the accused raised no objection to its release, and the guidelines from Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat were satisfied. The amount is to be released on execution of a Suputnama Bond, subject to conditions including photographic documentation, preparation of panchnama, and the applicant's obligation to produce the amount when required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed applicant Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi's application for interim custody of Rs. 70,000 seized in Crime No. 528/2025. The court found that the applicant prima-facie established ownership of the cash amount, the accused raised no objection to its release, and the guidelines from Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat were satisfied. The amount is to be released on execution of a Suputnama Bond, subject to conditions including photographic documentation, preparation of panchnama, and the applicant's obligation to produce the amount when required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts