Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi vs State of Maharashtra Through PS Bela — 29/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG100004012026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

315/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

528

Police Station

Bela

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi

Adv. Sakshi Sanjay Dhote

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PS (Police Station) Bela

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. J.M.F.C. Umrer

24-03-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed applicant Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi's application for interim custody of Rs. 70,000 seized in Crime No. 528/2025. The court found that the applicant prima-facie established ownership of the cash amount, the accused raised no objection to its release, and the guidelines from Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat were satisfied. The amount is to be released on execution of a Suputnama Bond, subject to conditions including photographic documentation, preparation of panchnama, and the applicant's obligation to produce the amount when required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed applicant Ranjita Suresh Badipahadi's application for interim custody of Rs. 70,000 seized in Crime No. 528/2025. The court found that the applicant prima-facie established ownership of the cash amount, the accused raised no objection to its release, and the guidelines from Sundarbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat were satisfied. The amount is to be released on execution of a Suputnama Bond, subject to conditions including photographic documentation, preparation of panchnama, and the applicant's obligation to produce the amount when required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case