Nanda Milind Mate vs Nil — 2/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 01st April 2026.
M.J.Cases - M.J.C
CNR: MHNG100001472026
e-Filing Number
21-01-2026
Filing Number
32/2026
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
23-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Umrer
Judge
1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nanda Milind Mate
Adv. SHEIKH SALIM SAFFI
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JT.CIVIL JUDGE JR. DVN. J.M.F.C.UMRER
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 28-01-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Joint Civil Judge granted a heirship certificate to the applicant (Nanda) under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing her as the sole legal heir of deceased Yashwantrao Sadashiv Bhongade. The court's decision was based on verified death certificates, unchallenged testimony from the applicant and witness, public notice without any objections, and documented proof that the applicant's mother and grandfather had predeceased the original deceased. The certificate is restricted to legal recognition only and cannot be used for property alienation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Joint Civil Judge granted a heirship certificate to the applicant (Nanda) under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing her as the sole legal heir of deceased Yashwantrao Sadashiv Bhongade. The court's decision was based on verified death certificates, unchallenged testimony from the applicant and witness, public notice without any objections, and documented proof that the applicant's mother and grandfather had predeceased the original deceased. The certificate is restricted to legal recognition only and cannot be used for property alienation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts