Nitin Arvind Gadge vs Ishwar Bhojrajji Ghodmare — 26/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG090007462024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2024
Filing Number
127/2024
Filing Date
12-03-2024
Registration No
26/2024
Registration Date
12-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitin Arvind Gadge
Adv. DEORAS SHRIRAM DATTATRAYA
Respondent(s)
Ishwar Bhojrajji Ghodmare
Manohar Bhojrajji Ghormare
Dhananjay Ajabraoji Ghormare
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 01-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 27-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 15-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 20-08-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to prevent defendants from replacing 80-year-old temple idols. The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie ownership rights, as documentary evidence showed the temple was a public structure constructed through village contributions rather than private property. The court also noted the idols were broken and unsuitable for worship according to Hindu rituals, and 92 villagers had signed a letter supporting the replacement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to prevent defendants from replacing 80-year-old temple idols. The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie ownership rights, as documentary evidence showed the temple was a public structure constructed through village contributions rather than private property. The court also noted the idols were broken and unsuitable for worship according to Hindu rituals, and 92 villagers had signed a letter supporting the replacement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts