Nitin Arvind Gadge vs Ishwar Bhojrajji Ghodmare — 26/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHNG090007462024

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2024

Filing Number

127/2024

Filing Date

12-03-2024

Registration No

26/2024

Registration Date

12-03-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 151

Petitioner(s)

Nitin Arvind Gadge

Adv. DEORAS SHRIRAM DATTATRAYA

Respondent(s)

Ishwar Bhojrajji Ghodmare

Manohar Bhojrajji Ghormare

Dhananjay Ajabraoji Ghormare

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Saoner

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

01-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

27-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

15-10-2025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

20-08-2025

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

01-04-2024
Order on T.I.

SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to prevent defendants from replacing 80-year-old temple idols. The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie ownership rights, as documentary evidence showed the temple was a public structure constructed through village contributions rather than private property. The court also noted the idols were broken and unsuitable for worship according to Hindu rituals, and 92 villagers had signed a letter supporting the replacement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to prevent defendants from replacing 80-year-old temple idols. The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie ownership rights, as documentary evidence showed the temple was a public structure constructed through village contributions rather than private property. The court also noted the idols were broken and unsuitable for worship according to Hindu rituals, and 92 villagers had signed a letter supporting the replacement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Saoner All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case