Navnath Kisan Gajbhiye vs Jafar Abbas Gulam Rashul Hussain Advocate - Adv. Rajani Tiwari — 2/2021
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act Section 16. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG080000452021
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
8/2021
Filing Date
04-01-2021
Registration No
2/2021
Registration Date
04-01-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kamptee
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Navnath Kisan Gajbhiye
Adv. D.K. Gawali
Respondent(s)
Jafar Abbas Gulam Rashul Hussain Advocate - Adv. Rajani Tiwari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. JMFC Kamptee
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 13-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's applications for condonation of delay and setting aside the "no written statement" order dated 20/08/2021 have been allowed. The court accepted the defendant's explanation that COVID-19 lockdown and family illness prevented timely filing of the written statement, and noted the Supreme Court's relaxation of limitation periods. The court found no prejudice to the plaintiff and determined that allowing the defendant to file the written statement would facilitate adjudication on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's applications for condonation of delay and setting aside the "no written statement" order dated 20/08/2021 have been allowed. The court accepted the defendant's explanation that COVID-19 lockdown and family illness prevented timely filing of the written statement, and noted the Supreme Court's relaxation of limitation periods. The court found no prejudice to the plaintiff and determined that allowing the defendant to file the written statement would facilitate adjudication on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts