Vishakha Amit Satfale Through POA Holder Jagdish Baburao Satfale vs Sarika Jitendra Chandravanshi — 1300/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHNG010160812025
e-Filing Number
08-12-2025
Filing Number
9355/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
1300/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishakha Amit Satfale Through POA Holder Jagdish Baburao Satfale
Adv. Swati Kishor Paunikar
Sujata Surendrakumar Rao through POA Holder Jagdish Baburao Satfale
Adv. Swati Kishor Paunikar
Respondent(s)
Sarika Jitendra Chandravanshi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Disposed
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 03-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 15-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 17-12-2025 | Awaiting Notice |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District Judge, Nagpur allowed the application and transferred Regular Civil Suit No. 64/2019 from the Junior Division court to the 17th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division court, where Special Civil Suit No. 1348/2022 is pending. Both suits concern recovery of amount under an agreement to sale for the same house property, and the court consolidated them to avoid conflicting decisions by different courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District Judge, Nagpur allowed the application and transferred Regular Civil Suit No. 64/2019 from the Junior Division court to the 17th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division court, where Special Civil Suit No. 1348/2022 is pending. Both suits concern recovery of amount under an agreement to sale for the same house property, and the court consolidated them to avoid conflicting decisions by different courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts