Ramesh Vishnu Madne vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation — 271/2025
Case under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Section 81(F). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHNG010114832025
e-Filing Number
08-09-2025
Filing Number
6774/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
271/2025
Registration Date
09-09-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Vishnu Madne
Adv. SHWETANK PURUSHOTTAM BEHAR
Respondent(s)
Nagpur Municipal Corporation
Hearing History
Judge: 25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 04-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 30-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 28-04-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court of Nagpur dismissed eight appeals filed by tenants against eviction notices issued by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) dated 25/08/2025 under Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The court held that the Abhyankar Smarak Trust's original lease (1937-1967) had expired 58 years ago without renewal, and the Trust's subsequent possession became unauthorized; therefore, the tenants' status was that of trespassers, not lawful occupants, making the eviction notice valid and legally sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Court of Nagpur dismissed eight appeals filed by tenants against eviction notices issued by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) dated 25/08/2025 under Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The court held that the Abhyankar Smarak Trust's original lease (1937-1967) had expired 58 years ago without renewal, and the Trust's subsequent possession became unauthorized; therefore, the tenants' status was that of trespassers, not lawful occupants, making the eviction notice valid and legally sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts