Vithal Mallu Bismille vs Sahebrao Kondiba Irpe Died Thr. Lr s Advocate - Waghmare Ankita G. — 93/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 15. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHND270008522020
Filing Number
195/2020
Filing Date
26-Oct-2020
Registration No
93/2020
Registration Date
26-Oct-2020
Court
Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Mudkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vithal Mallu Bismille
Adv. Hamand K. D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sahebrao Kondiba Irpe Died Thr. Lr s Advocate - Waghmare Ankita G.
-
2.A- Kondiba Sahebrao Irpe
Adv. Pachling M. V.
-
3.B- Dilip Sahebrao Irpe
Adv. Pachling M. V.
-
4.Potling Kondiba Bismille
Adv. Pachling M. V.
-
5.Ambubai Potling Bismille
Adv. Pachling M. V.
-
6.Laxmibai Venkati Injewad
Adv. Pachling M. V.
-
7.Khandu Mallu Sambod(Legal Heir) 7.
-
8.Kantabai Khandu Sambod 7.
-
9.Deubai Lingoji Makale
Adv. Pachling M. V.7.
-
10.Laxmibai Maroti Shigane
Adv. Pachling M. V.7.
-
11.Kashinath Khandu Sambod
Adv. Pachling M. V.7.
-
12.Omabai Madhav Surne
Adv. Pachling M. V.7.
-
13.Laxmibai Dhudaji Watte
Adv. Pachling M. V.
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
12-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
19-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
20-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
21-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
14-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
10-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Oct-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
07-Aug-2024
Steps
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
06-Jul-2024
Steps
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
26-Apr-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
14-Mar-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
13-Feb-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
12-Jan-2024
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
07-Dec-2023
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
19-Oct-2023
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
02-Sep-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
08-Aug-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
29-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-Apr-2023
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
06-Mar-2023
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
08-Feb-2023
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
07-Jan-2023
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-Dec-2022
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
15-Oct-2022
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
03-Sep-2022
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
25-Jul-2022
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
10-Jun-2022
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case 93/2020 Summary Petition Dismissed In this land dispute case, Vithal Mallu Bismille challenged the Tahsildar's order granting road access through his agricultural land to neighboring property owners (Respondents 1-5). The court found that the Tahsildar's order was legally valid, as an alternative eight-foot road existed on the western side of petitioner's field. The court rejected petitioner's claims that he suffered first possession rights violation and that the natural justice principles were breached, holding the Tahsildar properly exercised authority. The petition was dismissed with costs to be borne equally by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2022
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-May-2022
Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
29-Apr-2022
Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
22-Apr-2022
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
04-Apr-2022
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
21-Mar-2022
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
04-Mar-2022
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
11-Feb-2022
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
28-Jan-2022
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-Jan-2022
Compliance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
20-Dec-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
13-Dec-2021
Hearing Without W.S.
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Nov-2021
Hearing Without W.S.
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
10-Nov-2021
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
10-Nov-2021
Hearing
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
08-Nov-2021
Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
25-Oct-2021
Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
14-Oct-2021
Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
23-Sep-2021
Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Aug-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Jul-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
25-Jun-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-May-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
27-Apr-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Apr-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
31-Mar-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Mar-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Feb-2021
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
03-Feb-2021
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Jan-2021
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
21-Dec-2020
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Dec-2020
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
23-Nov-2020
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
26-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2020
Case 93/2020 Summary Petition Dismissed In this land dispute case, Vithal Mallu Bismille challenged the Tahsildar's order granting road access through his agricultural land to neighboring property owners (Respondents 1-5). The court found that the Tahsildar's order was legally valid, as an alternative eight-foot road existed on the western side of petitioner's field. The court rejected petitioner's claims that he suffered first possession rights violation and that the natural justice principles were breached, holding the Tahsildar properly exercised authority. The petition was dismissed with costs to be borne equally by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts