Ahemad Alias Raj S/o Lal Ahemad Qureshi vs Shaikh Mahmood S/o Shaikh Abdul Rasheed — 281/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHND140006252024
e-Filing Number
13-03-2024
Filing Number
380/2024
Filing Date
13-Mar-2024
Registration No
281/2024
Registration Date
13-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Degloor
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ahemad Alias Raj S/o Lal Ahemad Qureshi
Adv. Jadhav Ankushraje T.
-
2.Hannumiya Allahabakash
-
3.Mahebubsab S/o Imamsab Shaikh(Legal Heir)
Adv. JADHAV ANKUSHRAJE TULSHIRAM3.
-
4.Shaikh Rasul S/o Mahebubasab Qureshi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaikh Mahmood S/o Shaikh Abdul Rasheed
-
2.Shaikh Fayaz S/o Shaikh Chand Pasha
Adv. Inamdar Sk. Mujib Maheboob
-
3.Sagar Sainath Chintalwar
-
4.Gangadhar Jalba Kawatwar
-
5.Hanmanth Jalba Kawatwar
-
6.Hullaji Jalba Kawatwar
-
7.Aziz Maheboobsab Qureshi
-
8.Moulana Chandsab Daulatabadi
Case History
-
07-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
10-Apr-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
18-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
17-Feb-2026
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
27-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
22-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
02-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
07-Nov-2025
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
03-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
30-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 281/2024 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application to appoint a Court Commissioner for remeasuring disputed land in Degloor, Nanded. The judge held the application premature since the plaintiffs had not yet presented their evidence and issues remained unframed. Following Bombay High Court precedent, the court ruled that appointing a commissioner before plaintiffs testify amounts to improper evidence collection. Parties retain liberty to file such applications at appropriate later stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Aug-2025
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
19-Aug-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
30-Jul-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
07-Jul-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
21-Jun-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
09-May-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
07-May-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
29-Apr-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
25-Apr-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
05-Apr-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
03-Feb-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
06-Dec-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
03-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
30-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
19-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
24-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
29-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
16-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
12-Jun-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
10-May-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
18-Apr-2024
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
13-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 281/2024
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 281/2024 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application to appoint a Court Commissioner for remeasuring disputed land in Degloor, Nanded. The judge held the application premature since the plaintiffs had not yet presented their evidence and issues remained unframed. Following Bombay High Court precedent, the court ruled that appointing a commissioner before plaintiffs testify amounts to improper evidence collection. Parties retain liberty to file such applications at appropriate later stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts