Abdul Rauf Abdul Qayyum vs Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Amravati Advocate - D.M. Shrimali — 720/2023

Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 7(4). Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Respondents Evidence Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Appln PGA 2016

CNR: MHLC270008012023

Filing Number

801/2023

Filing Date

01-Jun-2023

Registration No

720/2023

Registration Date

01-Jun-2023

Court

Labour Court, Amravati

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 7(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Rauf Abdul Qayyum

    Adv. N.S. Raut

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Amravati Advocate - D.M. Shrimali

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 26-Nov-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 29-Sep-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    This document is a transcript of witness examination in a Labour Court gratuity dispute (Application PGA/720/2023), not a final court order with a substantive ruling. It contains the applicant's testimony during examination-in-chief and cross-examination regarding a gratuity claim of ₹4,14,253 against the opponent employer, with disputes over service continuity and benefits eligibility. The document ends with "R.O.A.C." (case adjourned/reserved) and does not contain a final judgment, bail decision, or petition outcome. SKIP - This is procedural hearing testimony, not a final court order with a dispositive outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 29-Sep-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 06-Aug-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 28-Apr-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 17-Mar-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 10-Feb-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 20-Jan-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 12-Dec-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 22-Oct-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 16-Oct-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 15-Oct-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 06-Sep-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 03-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 03-Aug-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 05-Jul-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 06-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 30-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 22-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 17-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 09-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 07-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 12-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 01-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 720/2023

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a transcript of witness examination in a Labour Court gratuity dispute (Application PGA/720/2023), not a final court order with a substantive ruling. It contains the applicant's testimony during examination-in-chief and cross-examination regarding a gratuity claim of ₹4,14,253 against the opponent employer, with disputes over service continuity and benefits eligibility. The document ends with "R.O.A.C." (case adjourned/reserved) and does not contain a final judgment, bail decision, or petition outcome. SKIP - This is procedural hearing testimony, not a final court order with a dispositive outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case