Bhagaji Bhanudasrao Kagde vs The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - DANKH SACHIN VASANTRAO — 5/2022
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4and7(1). Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Appln PGA
CNR: MHLC200000112022
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
40/2022
Filing Date
10-01-2022
Registration No
5/2022
Registration Date
13-01-2022
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagaji Bhanudasrao Kagde
Adv. BANKAR KUNAL AMRUTRAO
Respondent(s)
The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - DANKH SACHIN VASANTRAO
Managing Director, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,
The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sachin Ghayal Sugar Pvt. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross Examination
Steps
Dismissal Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-03-2026 | Steps |
| 21-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 12-02-2026 | Order |
| 17-01-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court rejected the application filed by Respondent No. 1 (Chairman of Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd) seeking deletion from the case. The court held that the respondent's liability for the applicant's gratuity claim cannot be extinguished merely due to the government's appointment of an Administrative Officer, and the gratuity issue must be adjudicated through due procedure before the respondent can be deleted from the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court rejected the application filed by Respondent No. 1 (Chairman of Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd) seeking deletion from the case. The court held that the respondent's liability for the applicant's gratuity claim cannot be extinguished merely due to the government's appointment of an Administrative Officer, and the gratuity issue must be adjudicated through due procedure before the respondent can be deleted from the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts