Bhagaji Bhanudasrao Kagde vs The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - DANKH SACHIN VASANTRAO — 5/2022

Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4and7(1). Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Cross Examination Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Appln PGA

CNR: MHLC200000112022

Filing Number

40/2022

Filing Date

10-Jan-2022

Registration No

5/2022

Registration Date

13-Jan-2022

Court

Labour Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4and7(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhagaji Bhanudasrao Kagde

    Adv. BANKAR KUNAL AMRUTRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - DANKH SACHIN VASANTRAO

  2. 2.Managing Director, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,

  3. 3.The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sachin Ghayal Sugar Pvt. Ltd.

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  9. 20-Nov-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  11. 29-Oct-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  12. 04-Oct-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  13. 24-Sep-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Labour Court rejected the application filed by Respondent No. 1 (Chairman of Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd) seeking deletion from the case. The court held that the respondent's liability for the applicant's gratuity claim cannot be extinguished merely due to the government's appointment of an Administrative Officer, and the gratuity issue must be adjudicated through due procedure before the respondent can be deleted from the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  16. 28-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  17. 11-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  18. 23-Jul-2025

    Aurgu. on Exh.

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  19. 05-Jul-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  20. 19-May-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  22. 01-Mar-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  23. 01-Feb-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  24. 20-Dec-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  25. 08-Nov-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  26. 28-Sep-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  27. 22-Aug-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  28. 29-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  29. 27-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  30. 23-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  31. 19-Jun-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  32. 29-Apr-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  33. 26-Mar-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  34. 22-Feb-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  35. 12-Jan-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  36. 08-Dec-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  37. 26-Oct-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  38. 13-Sep-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  39. 09-Aug-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  40. 06-Jul-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  41. 06-Jun-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  42. 24-Apr-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  43. 16-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  44. 27-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  45. 20-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  46. 21-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  47. 18-Oct-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  48. 20-Sep-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  49. 17-Aug-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  50. 03-Aug-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  51. 06-Jul-2022

    Ex-parte Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  52. 10-Jun-2022

    Ex-parte Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  53. 02-May-2022

    Ex-parte Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  54. 25-Apr-2022

    Ex-parte Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  55. 28-Mar-2022

    Ex-parte Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  56. 17-Feb-2022

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  57. 20-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 10-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court rejected the application filed by Respondent No. 1 (Chairman of Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd) seeking deletion from the case. The court held that the respondent's liability for the applicant's gratuity claim cannot be extinguished merely due to the government's appointment of an Administrative Officer, and the gratuity issue must be adjudicated through due procedure before the respondent can be deleted from the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case