M/s Ramratan Indrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs Mr Vinod Arjun Shinge Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal — 3/2023
Case under Industrial Dispute Act Section 39. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Ref.IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC060000432023
Filing Number
43/2023
Filing Date
11-Apr-2023
Registration No
3/2023
Registration Date
11-Apr-2023
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s Ramratan Indrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Adv. Vijay Mehta
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mr Vinod Arjun Shinge Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Mar-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Cross Examination
Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Steps
Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Steps
Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Steps
Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Steps
Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
order below ExhView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
order below ExhView PDF
Summary: The Labour Court, Mahad allowed the second party's application (Ref. IDA No. 3/2023). The court directed the first party (M/s. Ramratan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) to produce all documents mentioned in paragraph 2 of its written statement on record by the next hearing date. The court held that documents expressly mentioned in the written statement must be filed with it to prevent the opposing party from being surprised at the hearing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Aug-2025
Steps
Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
order below ExhView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Issues
Judge
-
23-Oct-2024
Issues
Judge
-
22-Aug-2024
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
20-Apr-2024
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
23-Feb-2024
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
01-Jan-2024
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
06-Dec-2023
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
09-Oct-2023
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
06-Sep-2023
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
02-Aug-2023
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
03-Jul-2023
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
09-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2023
Summary: The Labour Court, Mahad allowed the second party's application (Ref. IDA No. 3/2023). The court directed the first party (M/s. Ramratan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) to produce all documents mentioned in paragraph 2 of its written statement on record by the next hearing date. The court held that documents expressly mentioned in the written statement must be filed with it to prevent the opposing party from being surprised at the hearing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts