Ramesh Tukaram Pote vs Ms. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation — 5100004/2012
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000422012
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
59/2012
Filing Date
24-01-2012
Registration No
5100004/2012
Registration Date
24-01-2012
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Tukaram Pote
Adv. S M Golamade
Respondent(s)
Ms. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation
M/s Maharashtra State Co Opetative Marketing Federation Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 06-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 20-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 06-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 30-01-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Mahad allowed the unfair labour practice complaint filed by Shri Ramesh Tukaram Pote against Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd. The court found that the departmental inquiry against the complainant violated natural justice principles, particularly because the disciplinary authority disagreed with the inquiry officer's findings without providing reasons or opportunity for representation. The court set aside the complainant's dismissal from service and directed his reinstatement with continuity of service from 19/11/2011 and full back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Mahad allowed the unfair labour practice complaint filed by Shri Ramesh Tukaram Pote against Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd. The court found that the departmental inquiry against the complainant violated natural justice principles, particularly because the disciplinary authority disagreed with the inquiry officer's findings without providing reasons or opportunity for representation. The court set aside the complainant's dismissal from service and directed his reinstatement with continuity of service from 19/11/2011 and full back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts