Ramesh Tukaram Pote vs Ms. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation — 5100004/2012
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000422012
Filing Number
59/2012
Filing Date
24-Jan-2012
Registration No
5100004/2012
Registration Date
24-Jan-2012
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramesh Tukaram Pote
Adv. S M Golamade
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ms. Maharashtra State Co-op. Marketing Federation
-
2.M/s Maharashtra State Co Opetative Marketing Federation Ltd.,
Case History
-
04-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Hearing
Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Hearing
Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Hearing
Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
29-Sep-2025
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Restored
Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Report
Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Report
Judge
-
21-Mar-2023
JudgmentView PDF
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Mahad allowed the unfair labour practice complaint filed by Shri Ramesh Tukaram Pote against Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd. The court found that the departmental inquiry against the complainant violated natural justice principles, particularly because the disciplinary authority disagreed with the inquiry officer's findings without providing reasons or opportunity for representation. The court set aside the complainant's dismissal from service and directed his reinstatement with continuity of service from 19/11/2011 and full back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Mar-2023
Disposed
Judge
-
16-Mar-2023
Judgment
Judge
-
10-Mar-2023
Judgment
Judge
-
02-Mar-2023
Judgment
Judge
-
02-Feb-2023
Ex-parte Argument
Judge
-
06-Jan-2023
Ex-parte Argument
Judge
-
01-Dec-2022
Ex-parte Argument
Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
Ex-parte Argument
Judge
-
06-Oct-2022
Ex-parte Argument
Judge
-
05-Aug-2022
Cross Examination
Judge
-
01-Jul-2022
Cross Examination
Judge
-
13-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
08-Apr-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
04-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
03-Feb-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
07-Jan-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
02-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judge
-
01-Oct-2021
Appearance
Judge
-
01-Aug-2021
Appearance
Judge
-
09-Jul-2021
Appearance
Judge
-
07-Jun-2021
Appearance
Judge
-
09-Apr-2021
Appearance
Judge
-
03-Mar-2021
Report
Judge
-
05-Feb-2021
Appearance
Judge
-
06-Jan-2021
Appearance
Judge
-
08-Dec-2020
Appearance
Judge
-
04-Nov-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
08-Oct-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
08-Sep-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
11-Aug-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
04-Jul-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
06-Jun-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
11-May-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
04-Apr-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
02-Mar-2020
Awating service of notice/summons
Judge
-
07-Feb-2020
Appearance
Judge
-
09-Jan-2020
Appearance
Judge
-
09-Dec-2019
Restored
Judge
-
10-Apr-2018
JudgmentView PDF
-
10-Apr-2018
Disposed
Judge
-
07-Apr-2018
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
05-Apr-2018
Argument
Judge
-
06-Mar-2018
Argument
Judge
-
28-Feb-2018
Argument
Judge
-
02-Feb-2018
Argument
Judge
-
25-Jan-2018
Steps
Judge
-
28-Dec-2017
Argument
Judge
-
08-Dec-2017
Argument
Judge
-
07-Dec-2017
Cross Examination
Judge
-
03-Nov-2017
Cross Examination
Judge
-
06-Oct-2017
Appearance
Judge
-
29-Sep-2017
Appearance
Judge
-
26-Sep-2017
Appearance
Judge
-
11-Aug-2017
Written Statement
-
24-Jul-2017
Restored
-
01-Oct-2014
JudgmentView PDF
-
01-Oct-2014
Disposed
Judge
-
01-Oct-2014
Disposed
Judge
-
30-Sep-2014
Order
Judge
-
16-Sep-2014
Order
Judge
-
08-Sep-2014
Argument
Judge
-
11-Aug-2014
Argument
Judge
-
07-Jul-2014
Argument
Judge
-
23-Jun-2014
Argument
Judge
-
09-Jun-2014
Argument
Judge
-
05-May-2014
Argument
Judge
-
04-Mar-2014
Argument
Judge
-
11-Feb-2014
Argument
Judge
-
20-Jan-2014
Argument
Judge
-
23-Dec-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 5100004/2012
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Mahad allowed the unfair labour practice complaint filed by Shri Ramesh Tukaram Pote against Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd. The court found that the departmental inquiry against the complainant violated natural justice principles, particularly because the disciplinary authority disagreed with the inquiry officer's findings without providing reasons or opportunity for representation. The court set aside the complainant's dismissal from service and directed his reinstatement with continuity of service from 19/11/2011 and full back wages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts