Pandurang Vishwanath Birajdar vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Shinde Laxman N_DGP — 538/2018
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section Us18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHLA170026302023
Filing Number
461/2018
Filing Date
26-Nov-2018
Registration No
538/2018
Registration Date
26-Nov-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pandurang Vishwanath Birajdar
Adv. Jadhav Dhanraj K
-
2.Sow. Sunanda Pandurang Birajdar
Adv. Jadhav Dhanraj K
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - Shinde Laxman N_DGP
-
2.District Resettlement Officer
Adv. Shinde Laxman N_DGP
-
3.Special Land Acquisition officer
Adv. Shinde Laxman N_DGP8
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Birajdar v. State of Maharashtra (LAR 538/2018) The Civil Judge, Senior Division at Ausa, partly allowed the petitioners' land acquisition reference, enhancing compensation from Rs. 29,000/hectare to Rs. 5,000/rupee for 9.43 hectares acquired in 1994 for earthquake rehabilitation. The court rejected the State's claim that the award was consensual, finding the petitioners' initial consent was only to land acquisition, not to the compensation amount, and awarded Rs. 62,53,668 total (including 30% solatium, 12% component, and interest at 9-15% per annum). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
27-Apr-2026
Judgment
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
18-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
IssuesView PDF
-
18-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
05-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
13-Nov-2025
Dismissal Order
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
07-Mar-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
30-Jan-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
21-Dec-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
08-Nov-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
27-Aug-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
22-Jul-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
19-Jun-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
24-Apr-2024
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
16-Mar-2024
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
15-Feb-2024
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
04-Jan-2024
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
29-Nov-2023
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
02-Nov-2023
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
29-Sep-2023
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
22-Aug-2023
List of Witness
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
18-Aug-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
-
19-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 538/2018
Case Summary: Birajdar v. State of Maharashtra (LAR 538/2018) The Civil Judge, Senior Division at Ausa, partly allowed the petitioners' land acquisition reference, enhancing compensation from Rs. 29,000/hectare to Rs. 5,000/rupee for 9.43 hectares acquired in 1994 for earthquake rehabilitation. The court rejected the State's claim that the award was consensual, finding the petitioners' initial consent was only to land acquisition, not to the compensation amount, and awarded Rs. 62,53,668 total (including 30% solatium, 12% component, and interest at 9-15% per annum). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts