Pandurang Vishwanath Birajdar vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Shinde Laxman N_DGP — 538/2018
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section Us18. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Ref.
CNR: MHLA170026302023
Filing Number
461/2018
Filing Date
26-11-2018
Registration No
538/2018
Registration Date
26-11-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Decision Date
29th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Vishwanath Birajdar
Adv. Jadhav Dhanraj K
Sow. Sunanda Pandurang Birajdar
Adv. Jadhav Dhanraj K
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - Shinde Laxman N_DGP
District Resettlement Officer
Adv. Shinde Laxman N_DGP
Special Land Acquisition officer
Adv. Shinde Laxman N_DGP8
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Birajdar v. State of Maharashtra (LAR 538/2018) The Civil Judge, Senior Division at Ausa, partly allowed the petitioners' land acquisition reference, enhancing compensation from Rs. 29,000/hectare to Rs. 5,000/rupee for 9.43 hectares acquired in 1994 for earthquake rehabilitation. The court rejected the State's claim that the award was consensual, finding the petitioners' initial consent was only to land acquisition, not to the compensation amount, and awarded Rs. 62,53,668 total (including 30% solatium, 12% component, and interest at 9-15% per annum). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Birajdar v. State of Maharashtra (LAR 538/2018) The Civil Judge, Senior Division at Ausa, partly allowed the petitioners' land acquisition reference, enhancing compensation from Rs. 29,000/hectare to Rs. 5,000/rupee for 9.43 hectares acquired in 1994 for earthquake rehabilitation. The court rejected the State's claim that the award was consensual, finding the petitioners' initial consent was only to land acquisition, not to the compensation amount, and awarded Rs. 62,53,668 total (including 30% solatium, 12% component, and interest at 9-15% per annum). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts