Smt Nilabai Santram Ingale urf Nilabai Subhana Savalkar vs Prabu Subhana Savalkar — 10/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1, 2. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHLA170001002025
Next Hearing
20th July 2026
e-Filing Number
27-03-2025
Filing Number
102/2025
Filing Date
28-03-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
28-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Nilabai Santram Ingale urf Nilabai Subhana Savalkar
Adv. Ghogare Dattu P_LAPA
Yashoda Baliram Katke urf Yashoda urf Nanda Subhana Savalkar
Adv. GHOGARE DATTU PARSHURAM
Respondent(s)
Prabu Subhana Savalkar
Bhimrao Subhana Savalkar
Lahu Subhana Savalkar
Adv. Pande Prasad S
Mohan Prabhu Savalkar
Adv. Kadam Machindra B
Krushna Prabhu Savalkar
Kalpana Prabhu Savalkar
Shivganga Vithal Kawale
Ujwala Raghunath Narayankar
Asha Devanand Katake
Prabha Bhimrao Savalkar
Laxmibai Lahu Savalkar
Adv. Pande Prasad S
Virareddi Chitareddi Kogari
Adv. Pawar Abhay V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 08-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 28-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 04-12-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - Special Civil Suit No. 10/2025 The Court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint by attaching missing pages 5, 7, and 9 of Exhibit 5 and updating defendant numbers 7, 8, and 9's addresses within 14 days. A "No say" order was passed against defendants for failing to file their response despite adequate opportunity. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - Special Civil Suit No. 10/2025 The Court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint by attaching missing pages 5, 7, and 9 of Exhibit 5 and updating defendant numbers 7, 8, and 9's addresses within 14 days. A "No say" order was passed against defendants for failing to file their response despite adequate opportunity. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts