Smt Nilabai Santram Ingale urf Nilabai Subhana Savalkar vs Prabu Subhana Savalkar — 10/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1, 2. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Compliance Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHLA170001002025

e-Filing Number

27-03-2025

Filing Number

102/2025

Filing Date

28-Mar-2025

Registration No

10/2025

Registration Date

28-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1, 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt Nilabai Santram Ingale urf Nilabai Subhana Savalkar

    Adv. Ghogare Dattu P_LAPA

  2. 2.Yashoda Baliram Katke urf Yashoda urf Nanda Subhana Savalkar

    Adv. GHOGARE DATTU PARSHURAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prabu Subhana Savalkar

  2. 2.Bhimrao Subhana Savalkar

  3. 3.Lahu Subhana Savalkar

    Adv. Pande Prasad S

  4. 4.Mohan Prabhu Savalkar

    Adv. Kadam Machindra B

  5. 5.Krushna Prabhu Savalkar

  6. 6.Kalpana Prabhu Savalkar

  7. 7.Shivganga Vithal Kawale

  8. 8.Ujwala Raghunath Narayankar

  9. 9.Asha Devanand Katake

  10. 10.Prabha Bhimrao Savalkar

  11. 11.Laxmibai Lahu Savalkar

    Adv. Pande Prasad S

  12. 12.Virareddi Chitareddi Kogari

    Adv. Pawar Abhay V

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 12-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - Special Civil Suit No. 10/2025 The Court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint by attaching missing pages 5, 7, and 9 of Exhibit 5 and updating defendant numbers 7, 8, and 9's addresses within 14 days. A "No say" order was passed against defendants for failing to file their response despite adequate opportunity. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  12. 05-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  14. 04-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  15. 23-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  16. 26-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  17. 11-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  18. 02-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  19. 11-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 11-Jun-2025

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  21. 05-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  22. 21-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  23. 05-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  24. 29-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  25. 28-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 28-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - Special Civil Suit No. 10/2025 The Court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint by attaching missing pages 5, 7, and 9 of Exhibit 5 and updating defendant numbers 7, 8, and 9's addresses within 14 days. A "No say" order was passed against defendants for failing to file their response despite adequate opportunity. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case