Ranjeet Rajendra Mehkare vs Rajendra Narsingrao Mehkare and others 8 Advocate - Gavale Shyamsunder V — 1900052/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA160000962013
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
1900052/2013
Filing Date
20-06-2013
Registration No
1900052/2013
Registration Date
21-06-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ranjeet Rajendra Mehkare
Adv. Kamble Dhanaji N_LAPA99
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Narsingrao Mehkare and others 8 Advocate - Gavale Shyamsunder V
Anil Rajendra Mehkare
Adv. Gavale Shyamsunder V
Sandeep Rajendra Mehakare
Adv. Gavale Shyamsunder V
Pradeep Rajendra Mehkare
Adv. Gavale Shyamsunder V
Kasturbai Rajendra Mehkare
Adv. Gavale Shyamsunder V
Dnyanoba Govidrao Hulsure
Adv. Biradar Mahadev B
Murhari Madhav Mane
Adv. Apsingekar Bipin C
Shridhar Madhavrao Mane
Adv. Exparti
Kaveri Shivaji Mehkare
Adv. Biradar Mahadev B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 26-02-2026 | Compliance |
| 22-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
The document is in Marathi and contains witness testimony statements rather than a clear judicial order with a defined outcome. The text records statements from multiple witnesses regarding family matters and property disputes, but does not contain a clear final judgment, bail decision, or specific court order resolving the case. SKIP The document is too garbled and lacks a clearly identifiable case disposition or court order to summarize accurately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The document is in Marathi and contains witness testimony statements rather than a clear judicial order with a defined outcome. The text records statements from multiple witnesses regarding family matters and property disputes, but does not contain a clear final judgment, bail decision, or specific court order resolving the case. SKIP The document is too garbled and lacks a clearly identifiable case disposition or court order to summarize accurately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts