Dastagir Sayyad Maniyar and other 3 vs Bhanudas Shamrao Kumbhare Advocate - Dhongde Umakant K — 60/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA150002852019

Arguments

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

184/2019

Filing Date

29-03-2019

Registration No

60/2019

Registration Date

29-03-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Dastagir Sayyad Maniyar and other 3

Adv. Khandekar Keshav M

Respondent(s)

Bhanudas Shamrao Kumbhare Advocate - Dhongde Umakant K

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

30-04-2026

Arguments

16-04-2026

Defence Evidence

07-04-2026

Defence Evidence

24-03-2026

Defence Evidence

13-03-2026

Defence Evidence

Interim Orders

03-07-2025
Evidence
07-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS/60/2019 Outcome: The defendant's application was rejected with costs. The defendant sought appointment of a court commissioner to conduct a remeasurement of land survey no. 98 in Chakur, Latur, arguing the DSLR's initial measurement report was incomplete. The court rejected this, finding the DSLR had already properly completed the joint measurement as ordered, and the defendant had already cross-examined the witness. Duplicate applications for the same relief were deemed impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS/60/2019 Outcome: The defendant's application was rejected with costs. The defendant sought appointment of a court commissioner to conduct a remeasurement of land survey no. 98 in Chakur, Latur, arguing the DSLR's initial measurement report was incomplete. The court rejected this, finding the DSLR had already properly completed the joint measurement as ordered, and the defendant had already cross-examined the witness. Duplicate applications for the same relief were deemed impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case