Shakuntala Ankush Kundgir vs Ankush So Ramrao Kundgir Advocate - Badde Nagnath B — 1700082/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section -. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA150000802009
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1700082/2009
Filing Date
10-07-2009
Registration No
1700082/2009
Registration Date
16-09-2009
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakuntala Ankush Kundgir
Adv. Kulkarni S.S., Ambekar
Anita Ankushrao kundgir
Adv. S.H. Rajwansh
Ashwini do Ankushrao Kundgir
Adv. S.H. Rajwansh
Radhasham Ankush Kundgir
Adv. S.H. Rajwansh
Bhagyashri Ankush Kundgir
Adv. S.H. Rajwansh
Shriram Ankush Kundgir
Adv. Rajwansh Shaysundar H
Respondent(s)
Ankush So Ramrao Kundgir Advocate - Badde Nagnath B
masna Ramrao kundgir
Adv. N.B. Badde
Pandurang Ramrao Kundgir
Adv. N.B. Badde
meenabai Wo Sadashiv Kundgir
Adv. N.B. Badde
Sambhaji Sadashiv Kundgir
Adv. N.B. Badde
Shankar Sadashiv Kundgir
Adv. N.B. Badde
Laximbai Babu Devkati
Adv. N.B. Badde
Sharef Abbs Sayyed
Adv. Chakurkar Dhananjay P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this 14-year-old partition and property possession dispute, the plaintiff's application to set aside the evidence closure order dated 26.04.2023 was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to adduce evidence after she was absent on 26.04.2023, preventing the defendant's cross-examination. The plaintiff was ordered to pay Rs. 500 costs to defendant no. 8 and must appear for cross-examination on the next date without seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this 14-year-old partition and property possession dispute, the plaintiff's application to set aside the evidence closure order dated 26.04.2023 was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to adduce evidence after she was absent on 26.04.2023, preventing the defendant's cross-examination. The plaintiff was ordered to pay Rs. 500 costs to defendant no. 8 and must appear for cross-examination on the next date without seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts