Utkarsha Sanjiv Bhalke vs Shivprasad Waman Kure — 762/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 11th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA140031172025
Next Hearing
11th August 2026
e-Filing Number
17-10-2025
Filing Number
1737/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
762/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C, Ausa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Utkarsha Sanjiv Bhalke
Adv. INGLE MAHADEV DNYANOBA
Respondent(s)
Shivprasad Waman Kure
Mahesh Waman Kure
Ashwini Waman Kure alias Ashwini Vishal Shinde
Seema c
Meera Shivprasad Kure
Hearing History
Judge: 3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C, Ausa
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Issues |
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 18-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 762/2025 Utkarsha Sanjiv Bhalke v. Shivprasad Waman Kure & Others Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected on 08.05.2026. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of possession over the disputed property. The registered sale deed (No. 4012/2025) executed on 19.08.2025 in favor of defendant No.2, coupled with mutation entry No. 3726, established that defendant No.2 held actual possession—not the plaintiff. Consequently, no obstruction by defendants could be proven, and no irreparable loss would result from rejection. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 762/2025 Utkarsha Sanjiv Bhalke v. Shivprasad Waman Kure & Others Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected on 08.05.2026. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of possession over the disputed property. The registered sale deed (No. 4012/2025) executed on 19.08.2025 in favor of defendant No.2, coupled with mutation entry No. 3726, established that defendant No.2 held actual possession—not the plaintiff. Consequently, no obstruction by defendants could be proven, and no irreparable loss would result from rejection. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts