Santosh Narayan Kamble vs Kamalabai w/o Narayan Kamble — 393/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/oVIIRule1. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA090024342025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-06-2025

Filing Number

1025/2025

Filing Date

01-07-2025

Registration No

393/2025

Registration Date

01-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir

Judge

1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/oVIIRule1

Petitioner(s)

Santosh Narayan Kamble

Adv. PATIL DAYANAND MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

Kamalabai w/o Narayan Kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Compromise

23-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-01-2026

Appearance

13-12-2025

Lok-Nyayalaya

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 393/2025 The Rashtriya Lok Nyayalay (RLN) at Udgir resolved a property dispute between Santosh Narayan Kamble (petitioner) and Kamalabai w/o Narayan Kamble (respondent) through compromise settlement. The court disposed of the suit based on the parties' agreed settlement, directing the Sub-Registrar to register the award under the Indian Registration Act, 1908, and clarifying that revenue authorities may raise objections under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The plaintiff was granted a full refund of court fees paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 393/2025 The Rashtriya Lok Nyayalay (RLN) at Udgir resolved a property dispute between Santosh Narayan Kamble (petitioner) and Kamalabai w/o Narayan Kamble (respondent) through compromise settlement. The court disposed of the suit based on the parties' agreed settlement, directing the Sub-Registrar to register the award under the Indian Registration Act, 1908, and clarifying that revenue authorities may raise objections under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The plaintiff was granted a full refund of court fees paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case