Rahimkha s/o Fakirkha Pathan vs Raushanbi w/o Rasul Patel urf Pathan — 201/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA090011752025
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2025
Filing Number
524/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
201/2025
Registration Date
19-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rahimkha s/o Fakirkha Pathan
Adv. Sharwale A J
Respondent(s)
Raushanbi w/o Rasul Patel urf Pathan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 201/2025 The Rashtriya Lok Nyayalaya rejected the joint compromise memo filed by Rahimkha and Raushanbi in their property partition dispute. The Panel found that the settlement was not voluntarily arrived at, as Defendant No.1 could not identify her own brother (the plaintiff) during verification, and Defendant No.2 appeared to be under coercion. Consequently, the compromise terms were deemed unlawful and legally unexecutable, and the case proceeds for adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 201/2025 The Rashtriya Lok Nyayalaya rejected the joint compromise memo filed by Rahimkha and Raushanbi in their property partition dispute. The Panel found that the settlement was not voluntarily arrived at, as Defendant No.1 could not identify her own brother (the plaintiff) during verification, and Defendant No.2 appeared to be under coercion. Consequently, the compromise terms were deemed unlawful and legally unexecutable, and the case proceeds for adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts