Ganesh Kalleshwar Patil vs Apparao S/O Sangappa Patil — 124/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7RULE1AND2. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA090007972026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
397/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
124/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Kalleshwar Patil
Adv. KULKARNI MANIK KALIDASRAO
Janhavi D/o Kalleshwar Patil U/g Shilpa Kalleshwar Patil
Adv. KULKARNI MANIK KALIDASRAO
Shilpa W/o Kalleshwar Patil
Adv. KULKARNI MANIK KALIDASRAO
Vimalbai W/o Chandrashekhar Patil
Adv. KULKARNI MANIK KALIDASRAO
Respondent(s)
Apparao S/O Sangappa Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Disposed
Compromise
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Compromise |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 124/2026 The dispute between petitioners Ganesh Kalleshwar Patil and Janhavi (minor) against respondent Apparao Sangappa Patil, concerning land rights and property division, was referred to the Rashtriya Lok Nyayalay at Udgir. The parties reached a settlement and compromise, resulting in the case being disposed of by consent. The court awarded that the suit stands disposed in terms of the compromise, with directions to issue a precept to the Sub-Registrar for registration of the award under the Indian Registration Act, 1908, full refund of court fees to the plaintiff, and liberty for Revenue Authority to raise objections under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 124/2026 The dispute between petitioners Ganesh Kalleshwar Patil and Janhavi (minor) against respondent Apparao Sangappa Patil, concerning land rights and property division, was referred to the Rashtriya Lok Nyayalay at Udgir. The parties reached a settlement and compromise, resulting in the case being disposed of by consent. The court awarded that the suit stands disposed in terms of the compromise, with directions to issue a precept to the Sub-Registrar for registration of the award under the Indian Registration Act, 1908, full refund of court fees to the plaintiff, and liberty for Revenue Authority to raise objections under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1947. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts