State of Maharashtra vs Omkar S/o Shivaji Kamble (UTP) Advocate - Marlapalle Sanjay V — 4/2026

Case under The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHLA070000892026

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

55/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir

Judge

1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Rural Police Station Udgir

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1)(2)(I)(M)(f), 65(1)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Birajdar Shivaji P

Respondent(s)

Omkar S/o Shivaji Kamble (UTP) Advocate - Marlapalle Sanjay V

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Additional Sessions Judge -1 Udgir

25-05-2026

Evidence

13-05-2026

Evidence

30-04-2026

Evidence

20-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Omkar (Case 4/2026) Omkar's bail application was rejected on 24.03.2026. Accused of sexual offences against a minor victim under BNS Sections 64(1)(2)(l)(M)(f), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6 (maximum punishment: life imprisonment), the Additional Sessions Judge denied bail citing that the accused is a close family relative of the victim, risk of witness tampering, pending DNA forensic reports, and the serious nature of the offense committed within the family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Omkar (Case 4/2026) Omkar's bail application was rejected on 24.03.2026. Accused of sexual offences against a minor victim under BNS Sections 64(1)(2)(l)(M)(f), 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4, 6 (maximum punishment: life imprisonment), the Additional Sessions Judge denied bail citing that the accused is a close family relative of the victim, risk of witness tampering, pending DNA forensic reports, and the serious nature of the offense committed within the family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court , Udgir All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case