Pandurang S/o Divakar Chate vs Prakash S/o Ranba Chate and other — 1400022/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050020952025
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
912/2025
Filing Date
09-01-2020
Registration No
1400022/2020
Registration Date
09-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang S/o Divakar Chate
Respondent(s)
Prakash S/o Ranba Chate and other
Rupabai W/o Prakash Chate
Sakharam S/o Prakash Chate
Narsing S/o Prakash Chate
Nathrao S/o Ranba Chate
Pushpabai W/o nathrao Chate
Vijaykumar S/o nathrao Chate
Santosh S/o Nathrao Chate
Pradip S/o nathrao Chate
Dhananjay S/o Nathrao Chate
Rajabhau S/o Ranba Chate
Premalabai W/o Rajabhau Chate
Kishor S/o Rajabhau Chate
Vithal S/o Shivaji Chate
Anita W/o Vithal Chate
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 18-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 22-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The court ordered substituted service of suit summons on defendants No. 22 and 24 (Prakash Chate and Sakharam Chate) after regular service failed. The defendants could not be found at their stated addresses, having traveled to Sindhdurg and Latur respectively. The court authorized service by affixing copies to their house and village, with detailed documentation, and directed the plaintiff to publish summons in local newspapers where the defendants last resided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court ordered substituted service of suit summons on defendants No. 22 and 24 (Prakash Chate and Sakharam Chate) after regular service failed. The defendants could not be found at their stated addresses, having traveled to Sindhdurg and Latur respectively. The court authorized service by affixing copies to their house and village, with detailed documentation, and directed the plaintiff to publish summons in local newspapers where the defendants last resided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts