Bhagirathibai W/o Vaijnath Chate, Through Power of Attorany Laxman s/o Vaijinath Chate vs Manchak s/o Baswantrao Bondge and othr 1 Advocate - Bhurkapalle Ravindra E — 54/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U7r1and2. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA050005272016
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
475/2016
Filing Date
25-07-2016
Registration No
54/2016
Registration Date
25-07-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ahmedpur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhagirathibai W/o Vaijnath Chate, Through Power of Attorany Laxman s/o Vaijinath Chate
Adv. Bendkule Kishanrao V
Respondent(s)
Manchak s/o Baswantrao Bondge and othr 1 Advocate - Bhurkapalle Ravindra E
Jaywant s/o Shesherao Nagargoje
Adv. Uppe Viresh M_LAPA55
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ahmedpur
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 05-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 54/2016 - Bhagirathibai v. Manchak Outcome: The petition is dismissed. Cross-examination of both respondents was completed. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding land ownership and property rights related to Survey No. 261/3/4. The respondents' testimony established their legitimate claims to the disputed property, and the petitioner failed to provide substantive evidence supporting her position. No further proceedings are warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 54/2016 - Bhagirathibai v. Manchak Outcome: The petition is dismissed. Cross-examination of both respondents was completed. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding land ownership and property rights related to Survey No. 261/3/4. The respondents' testimony established their legitimate claims to the disputed property, and the petitioner failed to provide substantive evidence supporting her position. No further proceedings are warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts