Avinash So Apparao Deshmukh vs Shivlingappa S/o Madolappa Advocate - Patil Suhas G1. — 1/2026
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA040000142026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
9/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
Additional District Court, Ahmedpur
Judge
1-District Judge 1
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Avinash So Apparao Deshmukh
Adv. Ghogre Dhanraj L
Respondent(s)
Shivlingappa S/o Madolappa Advocate - Patil Suhas G1.
Rajewshwar S/o Vishwambhar Swami U/g his father Vishwambhar S/o Manmanth Swami
Uttam S/o Devidas Chalikwar
District Superintendent of Land Record latur
Tahsildar Tahsil Office Ahmedpur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge 1
Disposed
Arguments
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 05-02-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Judge allowed the delay condonation application and permitted Avinash Deshmukh to file a regular civil appeal against the lower court's October 2025 order that granted declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff, subject to payment of Rs. 700 costs. The appeal was registered for hearing on 04.05.2026, and defendants No. 3 and 4 (land record officials) were struck out from the suit and appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Judge allowed the delay condonation application and permitted Avinash Deshmukh to file a regular civil appeal against the lower court's October 2025 order that granted declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff, subject to payment of Rs. 700 costs. The appeal was registered for hearing on 04.05.2026, and defendants No. 3 and 4 (land record officials) were struck out from the suit and appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts