State of Maharashtra vs Sayyam Pritam Gatagat and Other 3 Advocate - Gaikwad Madhav P — 204/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,326,323,504,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHLA010050672022
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
1360/2022
Filing Date
16-12-2022
Registration No
204/2022
Registration Date
16-12-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Latur
Judge
3-District Judge 2nd Latur
FIR Details
FIR Number
363
Police Station
Gandhi Chowk Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. District Govt. Pleader
Respondent(s)
Sayyam Pritam Gatagat and Other 3 Advocate - Gaikwad Madhav P
Nihal Maheboob Tamboli
Adv. Patil Ram N
Somnath Rajendra Kadam
Adv. Patil Ram N
Rohan Ails Gotya Kumar Aadane
Adv. Gaikwad Madhav P
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 2nd Latur
Evidence
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 17-02-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 17-12-2025 | Awaiting Muddemal |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 204/2022 Accused Nihal Mehaboob Tamboli's bail application was allowed on 6th March, 2025. The accused had previously been enlarged on bail but breached bail conditions by absconding to attend to his father's medical treatment. The court granted bail upon executing personal bond (PB) and surety bond (SB) of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to the condition that he must attend all court proceedings without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 204/2022 Accused Nihal Mehaboob Tamboli's bail application was allowed on 6th March, 2025. The accused had previously been enlarged on bail but breached bail conditions by absconding to attend to his father's medical treatment. The court granted bail upon executing personal bond (PB) and surety bond (SB) of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to the condition that he must attend all court proceedings without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts