Yashvant Ganpati Patil vs Shripati Eknath Sonvale Advocate - K. M. Bote — 123/2018

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190005372018

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

166/2018

Filing Date

10-10-2018

Registration No

123/2018

Registration Date

15-10-2018

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34
IA/1/2019 Classification : Temporary - Interim Injunction Section Yashvant Ganpati PatilShripati Eknath Sonvale

Petitioner(s)

Yashvant Ganpati Patil

Adv. B. A. Wagare

Respondent(s)

Shripati Eknath Sonvale Advocate - K. M. Bote

Smt.Anandi Dashrath Sonvale

Pandurang Dashrath Sonvale

Shrikant Dashrath Sonvale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

29-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

04-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

28-10-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

12-02-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS 123/2018 - Yashvant Ganpati Patil vs. Shripati Eknath Sonvale The court set aside a no-cross examination order dated 06/03/2024 passed against defendants in this partition and perpetual injunction suit over immovable property. The court found that defendants' failure to cross-examine the plaintiff's affidavit (filed 29/11/2023) despite sufficient opportunity would prejudice their valuable property rights if proceedings continued without cross-examination. Defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 in costs to the plaintiff by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 123/2018 - Yashvant Ganpati Patil vs. Shripati Eknath Sonvale The court set aside a no-cross examination order dated 06/03/2024 passed against defendants in this partition and perpetual injunction suit over immovable property. The court found that defendants' failure to cross-examine the plaintiff's affidavit (filed 29/11/2023) despite sufficient opportunity would prejudice their valuable property rights if proceedings continued without cross-examination. Defendants were ordered to pay Rs. 1,000 in costs to the plaintiff by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case