Ganpati Krushna Patil(Legal Heir) vs Satappa Aannababu Patil Advocate - V. T. Dhanawade — 24/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38. Status: Ex_Party Hearing. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Ex_Party Hearing Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190000872025

e-Filing Number

05-02-2025

Filing Number

33/2025

Filing Date

05-Feb-2025

Registration No

24/2025

Registration Date

06-Feb-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,38

Petitioner(s)

1.Ganpati Krushna Patil(Legal Heir)

Adv. V. S. Khorate1.
2.Sukumar Ganpati Patil

Adv. V. S. Khorate1.
3.Parvati Ganpati Patil

Adv. V. S. Khorate

Respondent(s)

1.Satappa Aannababu Patil Advocate - V. T. Dhanawade
2.Jayshing Krushna Patil

Case History

07-Jul-2026

Next hearingPending
22-Apr-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
10-Mar-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
27-Jan-2026

Ex_Party Hearing

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
18-Nov-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary The application filed by Defendant No.1 to set aside the "No W.S and No-Say" order against him was allowed. The court found that proceeding with the perpetual injunction suit regarding immovable property without the defendant's written statement and say would prejudice his valuable rights. Defendant No.1 is ordered to pay costs of Rs.300 to the plaintiff on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Nov-2025

Ex_Party Hearing

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
22-Sep-2025

Order on ExhibitView PDF
22-Sep-2025

Ex_Party Hearing

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
12-Aug-2025

Dismissal Order

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
29-Jul-2025

Reply/Say

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
11-Jun-2025

Reply/Say

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
24-Apr-2025

Reply/Say

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
05-Mar-2025

Ex-Parte Order

Cjjd and JMFC Radhanagari
10-Feb-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
05-Feb-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 24/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The application filed by Defendant No.1 to set aside the "No W.S and No-Say" order against him was allowed. The court found that proceeding with the perpetual injunction suit regarding immovable property without the defendant's written statement and say would prejudice his valuable rights. Defendant No.1 is ordered to pay costs of Rs.300 to the plaintiff on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.