Satish Shamrao Lohar vs Bhimrao Dattu Lohar — 144/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO130010192019
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
235/2019
Filing Date
25-11-2019
Registration No
144/2019
Registration Date
25-11-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kagal
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satish Shamrao Lohar
Adv. V. M. Hanchanale
Respondent(s)
Bhimrao Dattu Lohar
Sushila Bhimrao Lohar
Amit Bhimrao Lohar
kamal Dattu lohar
Rangrao Dattu Lohar Deceased(Legal Heir) 5.
Rupali Sharad sutar
shamrao Dattu Lohar Deceased(Legal Heir)
Ramu Dattu Lohar
Ganesh Krushna Adure
Hindurao Ramchandra Thanekar
Dilip Hindurao Thanekar
Jannat Babu shaikh
Kalpna Ranjeet patil
Madhukar Dadu Lohar
Shivaji Dadu lohar
Ramesh Dadu Lohar
Indubai pandit sutar
Shantabai Maruti Sutar
Sundar Banda sutar
Chandabai Krushna sutar
Tatoba Govind Lohar
Dattu Babu Lohar
Shankar Dattatray Lohar
Baburao Dattatray Lohar
Satappa Govind Lohar
Maruti Gopala Lohar
Balaso Dattatray Lohar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C.Kagal.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 09-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 20-12-2025 | Written Statement |
| 07-11-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Case 144/2019 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's applications to set aside abatement, condone the delay, and add the legal representatives (LRs) of deceased defendant no. 1 on record. The court found the reasons justified, noting defendant no. 1 died in 2019, the delay was not substantial, and the cause of action survives. The plaintiff was directed to bring the LRs of the deceased defendant on record by the next date, with no costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 144/2019 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's applications to set aside abatement, condone the delay, and add the legal representatives (LRs) of deceased defendant no. 1 on record. The court found the reasons justified, noting defendant no. 1 died in 2019, the delay was not substantial, and the cause of action survives. The plaintiff was directed to bring the LRs of the deceased defendant on record by the next date, with no costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts