Appaso Dattatray Khot vs Ananda Vithoba Yangare Advocate - Raghunath. B. Patil — 43/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 01-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO110004372026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

58/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

43/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

1.Appaso Dattatray Khot

Adv. I. K. Shinde
2.Vishal Bapuso Khot

Adv. I. K. Shinde
3.Ananda Balkrushna Ganbavale

Adv. I. K. Shinde

Respondent(s)

1.Ananda Vithoba Yangare Advocate - Raghunath. B. Patil
2.Siddhappa Vithoba yangare
3.Kiran Shivaji Khot

Case History

01-Jul-2026

Next hearingPending
08-May-2026

Issues

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
15-Apr-2026

Issues

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
18-Mar-2026

Order on T.I.View PDF

Court Order Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 43/2026 (Peth-Vadgaon Civil Court) Outcome: The petition was granted. The court ordered that immediate possession of 12 guntha (units of land measurement) be granted to the petitioner (plaintiffs) against the respondents, pending final judgment in the case. The court found that the petitioners had a stronger claim to the disputed agricultural land based on evidence of settlement possession and survey records, and that granting the interim relief would not cause irreparable harm to the respondents who had clear legal remedies available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Mar-2026

Issues

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
17-Mar-2026

Order on Exh

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Order on Exh

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
07-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
07-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
07-Mar-2026

W.S. and Say

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
25-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
25-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
25-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
25-Feb-2026

W.S. and Say

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
20-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
20-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
20-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
20-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
20-Feb-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF
20-Feb-2026

Awaiting Notice

Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
18-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 43/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 43/2026 (Peth-Vadgaon Civil Court) Outcome: The petition was granted. The court ordered that immediate possession of 12 guntha (units of land measurement) be granted to the petitioner (plaintiffs) against the respondents, pending final judgment in the case. The court found that the petitioners had a stronger claim to the disputed agricultural land based on evidence of settlement possession and survey records, and that granting the interim relief would not cause irreparable harm to the respondents who had clear legal remedies available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.