Narayan Tukaram Patil vs Collector, Kolhapur — 190/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO090005982025

e-Filing Number

04-10-2025

Filing Number

614/2025

Filing Date

06-Oct-2025

Registration No

190/2025

Registration Date

07-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Narayan Tukaram Patil

    Adv. V. G. Desai

  2. 2.2- Mahaesh Narayan Patil

    Adv. DESAI VIJAY GOPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Collector, Kolhapur

  2. 2.2- Hon Collectors and Sadsya Sachiv Dist Niyojan Samit Kolhapur

  3. 3.3- Hon Executive Engineer

    Adv. व्ही. एस. जाधव

  4. 4.4- Hon Up Abhiyanta So

  5. 5.5- Hon Junior Engineer So

  6. 6.6- Hon Gram Mahasul Abhikari So

  7. 7.7- Shivraj Shashikant Desai

  8. 8.8- Maruti Babu Nakadi

  9. 9.9- Sarvesh Sambhaji Kanagutakar

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court granted the plaintiff's status-quo application under Section 151 CPC, ordering defendants to maintain the status quo of the suit property until the next date of hearing. The court found that defendants failed to file their written statement on the interim injunction application despite reasonable opportunity, and granting protection to the plaintiff was necessary to preserve the property and prevent the suit from becoming infructuous. Cost in cause was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  13. 18-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj

  14. 14-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  15. 14-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 06-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 190/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court granted the plaintiff's status-quo application under Section 151 CPC, ordering defendants to maintain the status quo of the suit property until the next date of hearing. The court found that defendants failed to file their written statement on the interim injunction application despite reasonable opportunity, and granting protection to the plaintiff was necessary to preserve the property and prevent the suit from becoming infructuous. Cost in cause was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case