Narayan Tukaram Patil vs Collector, Kolhapur — 190/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO090005982025
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
04-10-2025
Filing Number
614/2025
Filing Date
06-10-2025
Registration No
190/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Narayan Tukaram Patil
Adv. V. G. Desai
2- Mahaesh Narayan Patil
Adv. DESAI VIJAY GOPAL
Respondent(s)
Collector, Kolhapur
2- Hon Collectors and Sadsya Sachiv Dist Niyojan Samit Kolhapur
3- Hon Executive Engineer
Adv. व्ही. एस. जाधव
4- Hon Up Abhiyanta So
5- Hon Junior Engineer So
6- Hon Gram Mahasul Abhikari So
7- Shivraj Shashikant Desai
8- Maruti Babu Nakadi
9- Sarvesh Sambhaji Kanagutakar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Gadhinglaj
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 27-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 13-02-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court granted the plaintiff's status-quo application under Section 151 CPC, ordering defendants to maintain the status quo of the suit property until the next date of hearing. The court found that defendants failed to file their written statement on the interim injunction application despite reasonable opportunity, and granting protection to the plaintiff was necessary to preserve the property and prevent the suit from becoming infructuous. Cost in cause was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court granted the plaintiff's status-quo application under Section 151 CPC, ordering defendants to maintain the status quo of the suit property until the next date of hearing. The court found that defendants failed to file their written statement on the interim injunction application despite reasonable opportunity, and granting protection to the plaintiff was necessary to preserve the property and prevent the suit from becoming infructuous. Cost in cause was imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts