Sanyogita Pratap Shinde vs State Of Maharashtra — 240/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHKO010010222026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
453/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
240/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Court , Kolhapur
Judge
7-District Judge-2 Kolhapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
135
Police Station
Police Station Karvir
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sanyogita Pratap Shinde
Adv. NAIK JAYSINH PANDURANGRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Sessions Court, Kolhapur rejected Sanyogita Pratap Shinde's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged assault on a lady police officer, abuse, and creating public disturbance. The court found the allegations credible, noting the applicant allegedly bit the officer's hand, scratched her face, and abused her while fully aware she was a police officer, demonstrating "no fear of law" and rendering academic credentials and mental health history insufficient mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
11-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-2 Kolhapur
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 240/2026
The Sessions Court, Kolhapur rejected Sanyogita Pratap Shinde's anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged assault on a lady police officer, abuse, and creating public disturbance. The court found the allegations credible, noting the applicant allegedly bit the officer's hand, scratched her face, and abused her while fully aware she was a police officer, demonstrating "no fear of law" and rendering academic credentials and mental health history insufficient mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts