Lata W/o Vilas Chavan vs Arjun S/o Kisanrao Ambhure Advocate - NIMBALKAR D.S. — 68/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1,2,O.39,R.1,2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN100009332023
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
152/2023
Filing Date
09-10-2023
Registration No
68/2023
Registration Date
09-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lata W/o Vilas Chavan
Adv. CHAVAN P. D.
Respondent(s)
Arjun S/o Kisanrao Ambhure Advocate - NIMBALKAR D.S.
Balu @ Balasaheb S/o Arjun Ambhure
Adv. NIMBALKAR D.S.
Kailas S/o Arjun Ambhure
Adv. NIMBALKAR D.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 10-09-2025 | Evidence |
| 05-08-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 68/2023 Lata W/o Vilas Chavan v. Arjun S/o Kisanrao Ambhure & Others Decision Date: 30/09/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Lata Chavan under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 (for temporary injunction) was ALLOWED. The court granted relief restraining the respondents from creating any impediment to the petitioner's ownership and possession of disputed agricultural land (Plot 16, measuring 2 hectares 8 ares, located in Mantha, Jalna district), which was purchased through registered deed dated 24/08/2023. Key Finding: The court determined that the petitioner established a prima facie valid case for title ownership of the land, satisfactory balance of convenience favored granting relief, and irreparable injury would result if the injunction were denied. The respondents were directed to bear the petitioner's legal costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 68/2023 Lata W/o Vilas Chavan v. Arjun S/o Kisanrao Ambhure & Others Decision Date: 30/09/2024 Outcome: The petition filed by Lata Chavan under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 (for temporary injunction) was ALLOWED. The court granted relief restraining the respondents from creating any impediment to the petitioner's ownership and possession of disputed agricultural land (Plot 16, measuring 2 hectares 8 ares, located in Mantha, Jalna district), which was purchased through registered deed dated 24/08/2023. Key Finding: The court determined that the petitioner established a prima facie valid case for title ownership of the land, satisfactory balance of convenience favored granting relief, and irreparable injury would result if the injunction were denied. The respondents were directed to bear the petitioner's legal costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts