Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane vs Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane Advocate - DESHPANDE A.R., KULKARNI A A — 1/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN100000672018
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
20/2018
Filing Date
15-01-2018
Registration No
1/2018
Registration Date
15-01-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane
Adv. LIMBULKAR D.S.
Respondent(s)
Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane Advocate - DESHPANDE A.R., KULKARNI A A
Sampat Balasaheb Mathane
Gangadhar Daulatrao Mathane
Namdeo Gangadhar Mathane
Sushilabai Balasaheb Mathane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 21-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 26-11-2025 | Compliance |
| 12-09-2025 | Compliance |
| 14-07-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane v. Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane & Others (RCS 1/2018) Outcome: The petitioner's application for relief under CPC Rule 39 (1 & 2) was allowed. The court granted the petitioner's prayer for relief regarding disputed agricultural land boundaries and ownership rights. Key Issue: The case involved a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Mantha, Jalna District. The petitioner claimed ownership and possession rights over the disputed plot, while respondents contested these claims, asserting their own boundary rights and occupational interests in portions of the property. Court's Finding: After detailed examination of land records, survey documents, purchase deeds (registered 1995), boundary demarcations, and rival testimony from both parties, the court determined the petitioner established valid ownership and rightful possession of the contested property as against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane v. Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane & Others (RCS 1/2018) Outcome: The petitioner's application for relief under CPC Rule 39 (1 & 2) was allowed. The court granted the petitioner's prayer for relief regarding disputed agricultural land boundaries and ownership rights. Key Issue: The case involved a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Mantha, Jalna District. The petitioner claimed ownership and possession rights over the disputed plot, while respondents contested these claims, asserting their own boundary rights and occupational interests in portions of the property. Court's Finding: After detailed examination of land records, survey documents, purchase deeds (registered 1995), boundary demarcations, and rival testimony from both parties, the court determined the petitioner established valid ownership and rightful possession of the contested property as against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts