Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane vs Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane Advocate - DESHPANDE A.R., KULKARNI A A — 1/2018

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Compliance Next hearing 07-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN100000672018

Filing Number

20/2018

Filing Date

15-Jan-2018

Registration No

1/2018

Registration Date

15-Jan-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mantha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane

    Adv. LIMBULKAR D.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane Advocate - DESHPANDE A.R., KULKARNI A A

  2. 2.Sampat Balasaheb Mathane

  3. 3.Gangadhar Daulatrao Mathane

  4. 4.Namdeo Gangadhar Mathane

  5. 5.Sushilabai Balasaheb Mathane

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  3. 21-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  4. 26-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  6. 14-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  7. 23-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  9. 16-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Mar-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  11. 06-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  12. 30-Jan-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  13. 11-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  14. 23-Oct-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  15. 28-Sep-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  16. 10-Sep-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  17. 05-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  18. 02-Jul-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  19. 29-Apr-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  20. 11-Mar-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  21. 05-Feb-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  22. 05-Dec-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  23. 30-Oct-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  24. 11-Sep-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  25. 21-Aug-2023

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  26. 11-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  27. 09-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  28. 18-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  29. 23-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  30. 14-Mar-2023

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  31. 04-Feb-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane v. Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane & Others (RCS 1/2018) Outcome: The petitioner's application for relief under CPC Rule 39 (1 & 2) was allowed. The court granted the petitioner's prayer for relief regarding disputed agricultural land boundaries and ownership rights. Key Issue: The case involved a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Mantha, Jalna District. The petitioner claimed ownership and possession rights over the disputed plot, while respondents contested these claims, asserting their own boundary rights and occupational interests in portions of the property. Court's Finding: After detailed examination of land records, survey documents, purchase deeds (registered 1995), boundary demarcations, and rival testimony from both parties, the court determined the petitioner established valid ownership and rightful possession of the contested property as against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 04-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  33. 21-Jan-2023

    Citation

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  34. 03-Jan-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  35. 29-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  36. 17-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  37. 01-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  38. 16-Nov-2022

    Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  39. 18-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  40. 26-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  41. 03-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  42. 28-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  43. 16-Jun-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  44. 19-Mar-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  45. 04-Feb-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  46. 04-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  47. 27-Nov-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  48. 16-Oct-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  49. 03-Sep-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  50. 03-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  51. 05-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  52. 03-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  53. 22-Jun-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  54. 26-Apr-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  55. 01-Apr-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  56. 17-Feb-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  57. 01-Feb-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  58. 01-Jan-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  59. 23-Dec-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  60. 11-Nov-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  61. 07-Oct-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  62. 20-Aug-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  63. 13-Jul-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  64. 08-Jun-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  65. 07-Apr-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  66. 04-Mar-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  67. 29-Jan-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  68. 04-Jan-2020

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  69. 03-Dec-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  70. 22-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  71. 02-Nov-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  72. 25-Oct-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  73. 27-Aug-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  74. 13-Aug-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  75. 29-Jul-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  76. 06-Jul-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  77. 15-Jun-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  78. 17-Mar-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  79. 11-Mar-2019

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  80. 08-Dec-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  81. 17-Nov-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  82. 02-Nov-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  83. 12-Oct-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  84. 07-Sep-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  85. 03-Aug-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  86. 13-Jul-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  87. 07-Jul-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  88. 29-Jun-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  89. 08-Jun-2018

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  90. 22-Apr-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  91. 18-Apr-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  92. 28-Mar-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  93. 14-Feb-2018

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  94. 29-Jan-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  95. 15-Jan-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Gulabrao Dagaduba Mathane v. Balasaheb Daulatrao Mathane & Others (RCS 1/2018) Outcome: The petitioner's application for relief under CPC Rule 39 (1 & 2) was allowed. The court granted the petitioner's prayer for relief regarding disputed agricultural land boundaries and ownership rights. Key Issue: The case involved a property dispute concerning agricultural land in Mantha, Jalna District. The petitioner claimed ownership and possession rights over the disputed plot, while respondents contested these claims, asserting their own boundary rights and occupational interests in portions of the property. Court's Finding: After detailed examination of land records, survey documents, purchase deeds (registered 1995), boundary demarcations, and rival testimony from both parties, the court determined the petitioner established valid ownership and rightful possession of the contested property as against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case