Shakuntalabai Jalmsing Pawar vs Madan Parsaram Berad Advocate - SAPKAL VISHWAS B. — 158/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN060018122016
Next Hearing
30th July 2026
Filing Number
324/2016
Filing Date
19-11-2016
Registration No
158/2016
Registration Date
19-11-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakuntalabai Jalmsing Pawar
Adv. JADHAV D. S.
Sangramsing Jalamsing Pawar
Karansing Jalamsing Pawar
Respondent(s)
Madan Parsaram Berad Advocate - SAPKAL VISHWAS B.
Amit Madan Berad
Adv. SAPKAL R. K.
Sachin Madan Berad
Adv. SAPKAL VISHWAS B.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 158/2016 Outcome: The court framed revised issues under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Order 14 Rule 5 after the plaintiffs amended their claim. The case was adjourned pending finalization of the revised issues. Key Points: Petitioner Shakuntalabai and others claim property ownership and allege respondents encroached on the disputed property by constructing RCC structures without authorization. The court reformulated five key issues including whether petitioners possessed uninterrupted occupation, whether respondents unlawfully encroached, and whether petitioners are entitled to removal of structures and possession recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 158/2016 Outcome: The court framed revised issues under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Order 14 Rule 5 after the plaintiffs amended their claim. The case was adjourned pending finalization of the revised issues. Key Points: Petitioner Shakuntalabai and others claim property ownership and allege respondents encroached on the disputed property by constructing RCC structures without authorization. The court reformulated five key issues including whether petitioners possessed uninterrupted occupation, whether respondents unlawfully encroached, and whether petitioners are entitled to removal of structures and possession recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts