Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya vs Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate - PATIL V G — 81/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN050012742020
Next Hearing
13th July 2026
Filing Number
173/2020
Filing Date
18-12-2020
Registration No
81/2020
Registration Date
18-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya
Adv. DESHPANDE A.R.
Respondent(s)
Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate - PATIL V G
Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Abdulla
Adv. LIMBULKAR R.L.
Asaram Kundlikrao Bhosle
Adv. LIMBULKAR R.L.
Gramsevak
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 22-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 29-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 81/2020 Petitioner: Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya Respondents: Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate Patil V.G., Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Abdulla, Asaram Kundlikrao Bhosle Court: Joint Civil Judge, Partur Date: 31.08.2024 Outcome The petitioner's petition for declaring title and possession over disputed property in Jalana is dismissed. The court found the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership or continuous possession of the contested plot (Plot No. 162). The court rejected the petitioner's claims as her evidence regarding property boundaries, ownership records, and current possession remained contradictory and unsubstantiated. Respondents 2 and 3 demonstrated superior ownership rights through valid documents and registrations. Case costs are to be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 81/2020 Petitioner: Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya Respondents: Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate Patil V.G., Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Abdulla, Asaram Kundlikrao Bhosle Court: Joint Civil Judge, Partur Date: 31.08.2024 Outcome The petitioner's petition for declaring title and possession over disputed property in Jalana is dismissed. The court found the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership or continuous possession of the contested plot (Plot No. 162). The court rejected the petitioner's claims as her evidence regarding property boundaries, ownership records, and current possession remained contradictory and unsubstantiated. Respondents 2 and 3 demonstrated superior ownership rights through valid documents and registrations. Case costs are to be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts