Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya vs Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate - PATIL V G — 81/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN050012742020

Compliance

Next Hearing

13th July 2026

Filing Number

173/2020

Filing Date

18-12-2020

Registration No

81/2020

Registration Date

18-12-2020

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur

Judge

8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya

Adv. DESHPANDE A.R.

Respondent(s)

Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate - PATIL V G

Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Abdulla

Adv. LIMBULKAR R.L.

Asaram Kundlikrao Bhosle

Adv. LIMBULKAR R.L.

Gramsevak

Hearing History

Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur

27-04-2026

Compliance

16-03-2026

Compliance

12-01-2026

Compliance

22-12-2025

Evidence

29-09-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

31-08-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 81/2020 Petitioner: Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya Respondents: Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate Patil V.G., Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Abdulla, Asaram Kundlikrao Bhosle Court: Joint Civil Judge, Partur Date: 31.08.2024 Outcome The petitioner's petition for declaring title and possession over disputed property in Jalana is dismissed. The court found the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership or continuous possession of the contested plot (Plot No. 162). The court rejected the petitioner's claims as her evidence regarding property boundaries, ownership records, and current possession remained contradictory and unsubstantiated. Respondents 2 and 3 demonstrated superior ownership rights through valid documents and registrations. Case costs are to be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 81/2020 Petitioner: Sangita Kshrikumar Bagdiya Respondents: Kisan Narayan Sawant Advocate Patil V.G., Shaikh Yunus Shaikh Abdulla, Asaram Kundlikrao Bhosle Court: Joint Civil Judge, Partur Date: 31.08.2024 Outcome The petitioner's petition for declaring title and possession over disputed property in Jalana is dismissed. The court found the petitioner failed to establish clear ownership or continuous possession of the contested plot (Plot No. 162). The court rejected the petitioner's claims as her evidence regarding property boundaries, ownership records, and current possession remained contradictory and unsubstantiated. Respondents 2 and 3 demonstrated superior ownership rights through valid documents and registrations. Case costs are to be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case