Simabai Kailaschand Zawar vs Bhagwan Ganpat Ghatmal Advocate - BAGAL J. P. — 73/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN050006152018
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
129/2018
Filing Date
13-07-2018
Registration No
73/2018
Registration Date
13-07-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Simabai Kailaschand Zawar
Adv. PATIL V G
Respondent(s)
Bhagwan Ganpat Ghatmal Advocate - BAGAL J. P.
Dilip Dattopant Sangole
Adv. BAGAL J. P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 10-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 27-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 17-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Seemabai v. Bhagwan & Ors. (R.C.S. 73/2018) Plaintiff Seemabai sought a status-quo order to prevent defendants from alienating suit property and changing its nature pending final disposal of the perpetual injunction suit. The court rejected her earlier temporary injunction application (07.09.2019) finding no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. On 23.01.2024, the court rejected the status-quo application, holding that the pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal before the District Court makes the present application sub-judice, and noting no specific evidence of defendants' intention to alienate property despite four years elapsing since the status-quo application was filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Seemabai v. Bhagwan & Ors. (R.C.S. 73/2018) Plaintiff Seemabai sought a status-quo order to prevent defendants from alienating suit property and changing its nature pending final disposal of the perpetual injunction suit. The court rejected her earlier temporary injunction application (07.09.2019) finding no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. On 23.01.2024, the court rejected the status-quo application, holding that the pending Miscellaneous Civil Appeal before the District Court makes the present application sub-judice, and noting no specific evidence of defendants' intention to alienate property despite four years elapsing since the status-quo application was filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts