Pandurang Mainaji Satkar vs Vimal Bharatrao Suparkar Advocate - JHA A.N. — 221/2023
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section Section 5 and 6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN020011372023
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
e-Filing Number
04-07-2023
Filing Number
1133/2023
Filing Date
05-07-2023
Registration No
221/2023
Registration Date
06-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Jalna
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Mainaji Satkar
Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.
Respondent(s)
Vimal Bharatrao Suparkar Advocate - JHA A.N.
Krushna Bharatrao Suparkar
Kiran Bharatrao Suparkar
Kuldeep Bharatrao Suparkar
Ganpati Re Rols Pvt Ltd Through Director Kailash Rameshwar Loya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Pandurang Mainaji Satkar v. Vimal Bharatrao Suparkar & Others (2023) Court Order Outcome (21.07.2025): Petition partially allowed. Court granted interim protective order restraining respondents from transferring or creating third-party interests in the disputed 3.61-acre agricultural land (Gut No. 223, Naigaon village, Jalna district) until final judgment on the substantive property claim. Sale deed 4884/2020 declared binding on petitioner; costs denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Pandurang Mainaji Satkar v. Vimal Bharatrao Suparkar & Others (2023) Court Order Outcome (21.07.2025): Petition partially allowed. Court granted interim protective order restraining respondents from transferring or creating third-party interests in the disputed 3.61-acre agricultural land (Gut No. 223, Naigaon village, Jalna district) until final judgment on the substantive property claim. Sale deed 4884/2020 declared binding on petitioner; costs denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts