Rajendra Giri vs Deputy Director of Social Forestry Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh — 104/2016

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHIC270001642016

Cross Examination

Next Hearing

30th March 2026

Filing Number

161/2016

Filing Date

29-07-2016

Registration No

104/2016

Registration Date

29-07-2016

Court

Industrial Court, Amravati

Judge

1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Rajendra Giri

Adv. N.S. Raut

Gajanan Pachpor

Adv. N.S. Raut

Pramod

Adv. N.S. Raut

Raju Mahinge

Adv. N.S. Raut

Respondent(s)

Deputy Director of Social Forestry Advocate - U.S. Deshmukh

Plantation Officer Social Forestry Department

Adv. U.S. Deshmukh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Amravati.

06-03-2026

Cross Examination

18-02-2026

Cross Examination

31-01-2026

Cross Examination

20-01-2026

Respondent Evidence

01-01-2026

Respondent Evidence

Interim Orders

24-09-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant's application to amend the complaint in Case No. 104/2016. Permission was granted to add the Chief Conservator of Forest and Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralay, Mumbai as parties, as they are the financial benefit sanctioning authorities. The complainant has been directed to file the amended complaint within 40 days from the order date (24.09.2024). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Industrial Court, Maharashtra (Amravati Bench) allowed the complainant's application to amend the complaint in Case No. 104/2016. Permission was granted to add the Chief Conservator of Forest and Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralay, Mumbai as parties, as they are the financial benefit sanctioning authorities. The complainant has been directed to file the amended complaint within 40 days from the order date (24.09.2024). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Industrial Court, Amravati All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case